gyrogami logo



Gyrogami Blog - Precious Metals, Jewelry, Artwork


In the Beginning
Blog Index
   
Categories: Experiences and daily life; Jewelry

Word count/read time: 438 words; 2 minutes

Recently an order came in for a matching bracelet and necklace set using the Half Persian 4-in-1 weave. They were small rings: 3/16" inner diameter with 0.92mm round wire. Thanks to my trusty spreadsheet and the fact that I already made an identical bracelet previously, I knew how many rings I'd need and how long it would take.

I didn't have enough wire on hand to make them both so I grabbed some larger wire and drew it down to size. I wasn't going to mix-and-match jump rings from different batches, not that it would matter, and I had to make new ones anyway. Regardless, there'd be another gaggle of leftover rings to bolster my stash.

Drawn, coiled, cut, and cleaned, it was time to start building. It's been a while so I had to consult my tutorials. Some weaves can be a pain to start, especially in smaller sizes; I didn't fuse the first 15-20 rings so I could get a stable weave to build upon.

 
Again, a few dollars times a hundred is no longer just a few dollars!
 
One wise piece of advice is to keep a starter segment for the tough weaves, putting the starter back in the tool kit afterwards. Obviously, I hadn't heeded this credo. With so many weaves and different sizes, do I want hundreds of costly segments doing nothing...for eternity?

This starter would only be a few dollars, and the time saved on the next weave would make it worthwhile. Again, a few dollars times a hundred is no longer just a few dollars! Fortunately, some could ultimately be used for other sizes as well.

You have to pick your battles. While copper is cheaper and easily drawn into any wire size, I'd have to solder the rings closed. Unfortunately, the solder would remelt and make a mess once I started making a weave from it. Maybe a quick zap from one of my welders would be strong enough to endure, as ugly as it would be, without worrying about a molten waterfall.

Stainless rings would be best even if the sizes are not exact. However, it's back to spending more money on rings that will never be used except for a short section. It's wasted inventory in a sense. At least they don't take up much storage space, and anything made from them would basically be indestructible.

In the beginning you can start it anew or plan ahead. Sometimes preparations are fruitless as the situation never happens again. I opted to make a small chain section with the rings that were used to start the weave since I wouldn't re-use them on a finished product. It's a step better than the scrap pile.


Posted by M: October 26, 2026


Please email any thoughts or comments regarding this post.

Previous Entry  . . . .  Next Entry


Comment Section

NOTE: Your comments will be included in this section as long as they aren't illegal. This section is censor-free so show me your intelligence or ignorance and everything in between!



2026

In the Beginning
 
Purposeful Storage
 
So Many Gold Alloys
 
Wedding Anniversary Ring
 
Cabinet Maker
 
Rules of Engagement
 
Silverware as Jewelry
 
Wedding Kit
 
Yes, I Do Platinum!
 
Kinetic Ornaments
 
About That Price...
 
Viewer Discretion Advised
 
Copper Deserves Its Day
 
Interlocked Stackers
 
Boxed In
 
A Waste of Material
 
It's a Record
 
Crock Crack Pot
 
Oxyhydrogen Welder
 
Sizing a Ring
 
Ductile and Malleable, NOT!
 
New Jewelry Rings
 
Which Jewelry Metal Is Best?
 
My New Phone
 
Silver's Wild Ride
 
Synthetic Gemstones
 
Breath of Fresh Air
 
No More Room
 
Review: Commarker Titan 1
 
Pesky Descriptors
 
Top Purchases 2025
 

2025


2024


2023


2022


2021


2020


2019


2018


2017


2016


2015


2014




divider

(c) 2026 Metals by Mark®, all rights reserved